Free Phoenix MLS. Phoenix Real Estate. Phoenix AZ Foreclosures » Real Estate News

Phoenix One of the Worst Places to Retire NOT TRUE!

admin — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:25:03 +0000

Report Calls Phoenix One of the Worst Places to Retire…NOT TRUE!

PHOENIX – The Phoenix metro is named one of the worst cities in the country to retire — and you can blame it on the housing market. (see video interview below)

The valley used to be the place to retire — at least part of the year, because of our wonderful weather.

But now, some financial experts say the Phoenix housing market seems too gloomy.

Everywhere you look across the valley, there’s another house up for sale, and realtor Bette Zerba says a lot of those sellers will lose money.

“For those people that were thinking that their home was their retirement, I feel for them, because prices have come down dramatically at least 30 percent at least in Sun City areas,” says Zerba.

It’s also the main reason why Phoenix has been named one of the worst places to retire in the country, according to the fiscal times.

The other four places include: Las Vegas, Nevada, and Clark County in general; Davenport, Florida; and the Laguna Woods Village in Orange County, California.

A leading valley real estate professor says he doesn’t see the valley turning around for many years down the line.

Zerba agrees, and says retirees looking to sell are vulnerable.

“Right now they’re in the same predicament as a lot of people in the Phoenix area. If they did purchase after 2004, 2005 they are upside down, there’s no question about it.”

However, there’s a silver living in all this.

“The bright side of the coin, for those who truly want to do some cherry picking and get incredible buys, now is the best time in the world.”

There are 916 active listings in Sun City, Bette Zerba, Re/Max Realtor says

Mortgage Rates Fall To 4.8%

admin — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:17:22 +0000

Mortgage Rates Fall To 4.8%

Mortgage rates for 30-year fixed U.S. home loans fell for the second consecutive week, pushing borrowing costs to near record lows.

The average U.S. 30-year rate dropped to 4.87 percent from 4.94 percent last week. The 15-year rate was 4.33 percent, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac of McLean, Virginia, said today in a statement.

Falling rates helped boost home-loan applications last week to the highest level since May. The Mortgage Bankers Associations index of applications to purchase a home or refinance rose 16 percent. Rates around 5 percent, slumping home prices and a government tax credit for first-time homebuyers are bolstering demand for housing.

Were not expecting the housing market to come roaring back to anything close to what it was during the boom, said Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James & Associates Inc. in St. Petersburg, Florida. It’s going to be a long, gradual recovery.

The Federal Reserve set out last year to encourage lower mortgage rates by pledging to buy bonds backed by home loans. It increased the size of the program to $1.25 trillion in March.

The purchases from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae brought down yields on mortgage-backed securities and allowed lenders to reduce rates on new loans while still selling the securities backed by them at a profit. The plan helped drive home loan rates to a record low of 4.78 percent twice in April.

Applications Rise

Mortgage applications to buy a home climbed 13 percent in the week ended Oct. 2 and the refinancing gauge surged 18 percent.

Recent data indicate the housing industry is emerging from its worst recession since the 1930s. The index of signed purchase agreements, or pending home sales, jumped 6.4 percent in August, a seventh consecutive gain, the National Association of Realtors said on Oct. 1.

Source: Bloomberg News

Free Phoenix MLS Search
Features Full and FREE access to ALL Phoenix MLS Metro Area Listings of all homes available in: Phoenix, Scottsdale, Paradise Valley, Cave Creek, Carefree, Sun City, Peoria, Glendale, Surprise, Buckeye, Avondale, Tempe, Chandler, and Mesa, Arizona. Find REO’s, Short Sales,Bank Owned, Foreclosures! The Cutty Group!

New Law Makes Mortgage Fraud A Felony

admin — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:25:28 +0000

New law Makes Mortgage Fraud A Felony. $200 Million Fund To Prosecute Real Estate Fraud

New national legislation calls for setting up a $200 million fund to help states prosecute mortgage and real estate fraud cases.

Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) is teaming with Charles Schumer (D-NY) to back the Fighting Real Estate Fraud Act of 2009, which would set up a grant program that local prosecutors, state attorney generals and Native American Tribes could apply for to fund investigations.

Arizona is in the top 20 states for mortgage fraud, according to a Federal Bureau of Investigation report issued earlier this year. Mortgage giant Fannie Mae ranked Arizona no. 5 for the highest rate of “significant misrepresentations” discovered on loans originated in 2007-08.

“This grant program will give state prosecutors the resources needed to investigate and target those who fraudulently profited from predatory lending practices during the housing boom, as well as those who are illegally stripping homes during the downturn of the market,” said Kyl.

Arizona has a new law making mortgage fraud a felony, which should help crack down on some of the scams. Starting next summer, mortgage loan officers must be licensed in Arizona, which will also help.

In the Kyl-Schumer legislation real estate fraud is defined as including “…crime involving purposeful misrepresentations, forgeries, omissions to general applications, tax returns, financial statements, appraisals and valuations, verifications of deposit and employment, escrow and closing documents, credit reports, and any actions that may defraud a secured creditor.”

Foreclosure home stripping started in the Valley last year and continues despite recent arrests and indictments. Stripping a foreclosure home is defrauding a secured creditor and covered in the legislation.

Arizona has a mortgage fraud task force that was formed by state regulators, the Arizona Attorney General, the FBI, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and other government agencies. The goal is to collaborate on cases and share information to prosecute offenders because proving real estate or mortgage fraud is a much more document-intensive process than proving other crimes.

The Kyl-Schumer legislation calls for local and state groups applying for funds to prosecute and investigate real estate fraud cases through the U.S. Attorney General. About 70 percent of the $100 million would be allocated to local prosecutors and Native American tribes and the other 30 percent would go to state attorney generals.

Earlier this year, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard teamed with 17 other state attorney generals, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission to launch a national crackdown dubbed “Operation Loan Lies.” The crackdown involves 180 U.S. law-enforcement actions against deceptive loan-modification and foreclosure-rescue firms, including several in Arizona.

Source: Catherine Reagor http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/CatherineReagor/

Meritage Homes buys 1300 Maricopa AZ lots

admin — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:56:51 +0000

Meritage Homes buys 1,300 Maricopa AZ lots

Scottsdale-based Meritage Homes Corp. has purchased the undeveloped portion of a large, age-restricted community in the city of Maricopa, about 40 miles south of Phoenix.

Meritage said Monday that it had purchased about 1,300 vacant lots inside Province, a master-planned “active-adult community” originally developed by Engle Homes and Phoenix-based Sunbelt Holdings.

About 400 of the lots are “finished,” with plumbing, electrical and other infrastructure in place.

The other 900 lots have been approved for residential development but do not have infrastructure, according to a statement from Meritage, which did not disclose the sale price.

Province was designed to hold 2,200 lots at build-out. Engle Homes completed about 900 homes inside the community before its parent company, Hollywood, Fla.-based TOUSA Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2008.

Like most home builders still in business, Meritage has been struggling with its own financial problems.

The company recently walked away from a $92 million agreement with the State Land Department to purchase 288 acres of state trust land inside the Desert Ridge master-planned community in north Phoenix.

Meritage has said that it lost $55 million in the failed land buy.
by J. Craig Anderson The Arizona Republic

US Housing Market Report. Housing Foreclosure Cloud

admin — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:42:07 +0000

US Housing Market Report

Some clouds in housing report gain. Overall increase in starts is tempered by downturn in single-family component

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — New home building increased overall in August, a government report said Thursday, but the gain was clouded by a dip in new construction of single-family homes.

The Census Bureau reported Thursday that builders broke ground for 598,000 new homes during August, up 1.5% from a revised 589,000 in July. That matched a consensus analyst forecast compiled by Briefing.com.

Building permits rose 2.7% to 579,000 from a revised 564,000 in July.

A troubling aspect of the report was that starts of new single-family homes fell 3% in the month. Overall starts were higher due to a big gain in multi-family housing starts.

According to economist Jeff Rosen of Briefing.com, multi-family home starts tend to vary much more than those of single family homes. He places more importance on the drop in single families than what could be an anomalous rise in multi-family starts.

The housing starts report was the latest in a series of releases that indicate that the market may have bottomed. These include improvement in new home sales, existing home sales and housing prices.

On Wednesday, the National Association of Home Builders reported their index of homebuilder confidence had risen a point to 19, its highest level since May 2008.

Helping to boost demand for new homes has been the first-time homebuyer tax credit, which has enabled many builders to reduce their inventories of unsold homes.

“Many builders have not only reduced excess inventory, but now are actually reporting such low inventory that they need to start more homes to replace those they’ve just sold,” said Brad Hunter, chief economist for Metrostudy, a real estate analytics firm.

Both starts and permits are still well off from their levels of a year ago. The number of starts is down 29.6% from 849,000 last August, and permits dropped 32.4% from 857,000 last year.

Foreclosure cloud: There are some other clouds on the horizon. Foreclosures continue to trouble many markets; another 76,000 homes were repossessed by banks in August. That was actually an improvement over recent months, but the expectation is that the rate of foreclosures will begin rising again.

That’s because a great number of non-conventional mortgage loans, including interest-only mortgages and option ARMS, will reset over the next year or so, yielding substantial increases in the monthly mortgage payments for homeowners. Many people will not be able to afford the increases.

With interest-only loans, homeowners pay just the interest for a fixed number of months, usually 60, before they have to start paying off the mortgage at fully amortizing rates. There was an explosion of these mortgages issued in 2005, so many will reset in 2010.

Option ARMs are loans in which borrowers are permitted to make minimum payments every month, payments that are less than their monthly interest charges. Many borrowers use that option for as long as they can, but once the mortgage balance reaches between 110% and 125% of the original loan balance, the loans reset into a fully amortizing mortgage — and payments rise steeply since the balances themselves have also gone up.

Real estate analysts predict a spike in these resetting loans, which might force another wave of homeowners into foreclosure.

The fear is that all these foreclosed homes will flood the market and drive down prices even more for existing homes, making it harder for new-home builders to compete.

According to real estate analyst Mike Larson of Weiss Research, builders might be more confident except for concern over the end of the first-time homebuyer’s tax credit, which enables buyers who have not owned a home for the past three years to take as much as $8,000 off the federal taxes they pay.

That program lapses on Dec. 1, although Larson figures the odds of extending it at better than even. “Still, builders may be scaling back until they see what happens to that,” he said. To top of page

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer. http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/17/real_estate/August_housing_starts/index.htm?postversion=2009091714

Healthiest Housing Markets for 2009

admin — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:12:00 +0000

The Healthiest Housing Markets for 2009
Builder, in conjunction with Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, debuts its metric for determining markets with the best and least potential.
By: Boyce Thompson

With most economists and builders expecting a national market decline this year, this may not seem like the best time to be selecting the “healthiest” markets in the country. Virtually every market was down last year. But a close look at the numbers reveals that some markets have way outperformed others during the last four years and are likely to continue to do so this year.

When the housing market stages its official recovery, the markets listed on the following pages are likely to lead the parade. It may take a year or more for the weakest markets–where burgeoning foreclosure sales are still pounding new home values, making building and selling new homes an exercise in futility– to finally stage a turnaround. We’ll present that list next week.

The healthiest markets have many things in common. Most of them are great places to live, either close to the ocean, mountains, or major universities. Most of them didn’t have a huge run-up in prices during the boom and aren’t experiencing rampant deflation during the bust.

To compile these lists, we analyzed the top 75 housing markets in the country. We ranked them based on population trends and job growth, perennial drivers of housing demand. We also examined what’s happened with home prices; many of the healthiest markets have managed to hold the line on home values. And finally, we considered the rate building permits, which may be the single best ongoing indicator of builder confidence in a market. We combined all these metrics to produce a score for each market. Here are the top 15, in reverse order.

15. Myrtle Beach, S.C.
2008 total building permits: 3,211

Though permit activity dropped sharply last year, Myrtle Beach remains one of the hottest markets in the country, especially when you analyze the number of permits pulled per resident. Only 263,287 people live in the Myrtle Beach metro area, which until recently had been growing its population by nearly 5 percent a year. That means builders pulled one permit for every 82 residents. A steady influx of people, many of them retirees, are drawn by close proximity to the ocean and 117 golf courses at last count. That has helped keep home prices steady; they fell only 10 percent last year to a very affordable $174,800. Most of the home building is split between Brunswick and New Hanover counties. Jobs are dependent on the tourist industry, though, and the metro area was rocked last year when a $400 million rock-and-roll themed amusement part, Hard Rock Park, opened and then filed for bankruptcy. Myrtle Beach added jobs last year, but as of December employment was decreasing at a 4.2 percent rate compared to a year earlier.

14. Wilmington, N.C.
2008 total building permits: 3,551

Wilmington has the second highest ratio of permits pulled per resident, behind only Myrtle Beach. The population here, 352,919 by Census estimates, has been growing at a 4 percent annual rate for the last five years, well above the national average. Primary residents are drawn by a four-season climate, close proximity to Atlantic beaches, and affordable housing. Median home prices, at $198,700, are just about the national average. The area gave back 1,000 jobs last year, after gaining 19,000 the previous three years. Wilmington has had a 60 percent decline in permit activity since 2005, around the national average, but its track record for population growth helps it make this list.

13. Charlotte, N.C.
2008 total building permits: 12,231

People and businesses must love Charlotte, because they are moving there at a high rate. The metro area of 1.74 million has grown its residents by 4 percent annually over the last five years, one of the highest rates in the country. They are drawn by relatively affordable housing for the east coast—median home prices are only $210,900, and they’ve only “corrected” downward by only 4.2 percent in the last year. A strong fourth quarter helped Charlotte record 12,231 permits last year, only a 44 percent decline since 2005. Charlotte’s strength relative to other markets led the investment banking firm UBS to predict last year that it would be one of the first markets to recover from the housing downturn. Charlotte is still a single-family market, with 62 percent of the residential activity in stand-alone homes. The job market in this banking hub contracted last year, after growing 3 to 5 percent annually the previous three years.

12. Denver, Col. 2008 total building permits: 8,800

Denver has been all over the home building news of late, with Beazer and Centex leaving town, then Village Homes of Colorado declaring bankruptcy. But the market hasn’t been hit as hard by the home building recession as other Western markets, in part because it didn’t experience rampant price appreciation during the boom. That’s partly because there’s lots of land available to develop in Denver. The median price of an existing home here was still an affordable $225,100 in the third quarter of last year, down only 11.4 percent in the last year (through 3Q 08). Denver enjoys one of the highest population growth rates in the country–2 percent annually for each of the last five years. Builders pulled 8,800 permits in Denver last year, down from 20,864 in 2005, a percentage decline that’s close to the national average. Denver is buoyed by a strong commercial real estate market.

11. Nashville, Tenn. 2008 total building permits: 8,142

Nashville, the 20th largest home building market, operated under the radar of the national housing boom. It didn’t ramp up wildly during the boom years, and it’s not contracting viciously during the bust. Median home prices remain an affordable $152,100, propped up by a growing job base. Eighty percent of the residential construction is single-family. Some of the market’s resilience stems from above-average population growth of about 2.3 percent a year. Back in the day, 2005, Nashville accounted for 16,654 permits; it now runs at about half that level. But that’s a better performance than most major markets.

10. Washington DC 2008 total building permits: 11,693

Washington D.C. showed signs last summer that it might be emerging from the downturn, then it turned south again. Even so, the area produces a ton of jobs—an estimated 35,000 in the last year—that fuel a vibrant housing market, the 11th largest in the country. Many of the jobs stem from contracts with the federal government. Washington D.C. remains a relatively unaffordable place to live, with a median home price of $332,700 in the third quarter of last year. But values have fallen only 24 percent in the last year in part because the population continues to grow—an average of 1 percent annually over the last five years. Home building patterns have changed dramatically in the nation’s capital with builders mothballing subdivisions well beyond the beltway and focusing on infill opportunities. The region remains one of the worst in the nation for commuters.

9. Fayetteville, Ark. 2008 total building permits: 2,989

Fayetteville has made some important lists in recent years. Located in the foothills of the Ozarks and within an easy drive of Wal-Mart’s corporate headquarters, it has recently been named one of the best places to live (by Kiplinger) and to do business (by Inc.). Employment, which had been strongly positive since 2005, dropped somewhat in the fourth quarter of last year. Recent layoffs at Wal-Mart’s corporate office sent tremors through the market. But several Fortune 500 companies that sell products to Wal-Mart have established offices here, and they have helped Fayetteville achieve one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, 4.1 percent in the fourth quarter. The University of Arkansas is also located in Fayetteville, and it has helped attract start-up businesses. Residents are drawn by an affordable housing stock; median prices average only $139,400, below the national average, and they’ve lost only 2.4 percent of their value in the last year. Builders pulled only 2,989 residential permits last year, down from 7, 449 in 2005.

8. Indianapolis, Ind. 2008 total building permits: 7,004

Builders are still pulling permits at a relatively healthy rate in Indianapolis, despite a virtually flat job market. Unlike other major markets that have become multifamily-oriented, single family still accounts for two-thirds of home building activity. Ultra-affordable housing accounts for some of the activity—the median price of a home here is only $117,900, making it one of the most affordable markets in the country. As a result, home prices have declined only 4.5 percent in the last year. At the top of the market in 2005, builders in Indianapolis took down 15,619 permits, so activity is down 55 percent, slightly better than the national average. Unfortunately, the relative health of the market wasn’t enough to keep Davis Homes, one of the area’s largest private builders, from going out of business last year.

7. Seattle, Wash. 2008 total building permits: 13,021

Seattle, a city of 3.4 million people, last year weighed in as the eighth largest home building market. Residential construction activity here, as measured by permits, is off only 50 percent since 2005, much better than most markets. Seattle has steadily transitioned during the last 10 years from an affordable to an upscale housing market, with the median price of an existing home reaching above $350,000. Even so, existing home prices fell only 11 percent in the last year. One of the secrets to Seattle’s success is that it has added lots of jobs in recent years; and held on to them last year. Some builders there have even stepped up their land buying in anticipation of a market recovery. As the city has become more urban, the share of single family to multifamily permits has reversed; multifamily now accounts for 58 percent of activity.

6. Raleigh, N.C. 2008 total building permits: 11,386

Another state capital with multiple universities, Raleigh was still adding jobs at a 1.9 percent annual rate though the third quarter of last year. With a population of more than 1 million, it also has one of the highest rates of population growth of any top metro market in the country over the last five years: nearly 5 percent annually. Though the price of a median home here, $221,900, is above the national average, it is well below other cities in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast. The metro area has added roughly 68,000 jobs since 2005, and employment held steady last year. With a glut of national builders in the market, locals such as Dixon Kirby have experimented with different looks and styles to keep sales alive.

5. Dallas, Texas 2008 total building permits: 26,145

In a year when permits declined 35 percent nationally, Dallas only experienced a 9 percent fall-off. With a population of 4.2 million, Dallas was the third largest home building market last year, as measured in permits pulled. Employers in Dallas, a popular place for corporate relocation and expansion, added 42,000 jobs last year, a growth rate of 2 percent. Existing home prices have held steady, falling a paltry 2.3 percent in the last year, Interestingly, the face of residential construction has changed dramatically in Dallas in recent years; 58 percent of the activity last year was in multifamily, compared to a five-year average of 23 percent. The relative stability of the market, though, wasn’t enough to prevent Wall Homes from filing for bankruptcy earlier this year. On the other hand, former Meritage co-CEO John Landon recently started a new Dallas-based home building company.

4. San Antonio, Texas 2008 total building permits: 10,261

San Antonio is another Texas market that is still adding jobs, about 15,000 last year. A city of more than 2 million people now, its population is also growing, at a 2.8 percent annual clip through the third quarter of last year. Existing home prices are barely declining in San Antonio, down only 1.8 percent in the last year, leaving the median price of an existing single-family home at an affordable $154,400, 25 percent below the national average of $200,500, according to the National Association of Realtors. The upper end of the housing market was hurt recently when AT&T announced it would be moving its corporate headquarters to Dallas.

3. Fort Worth, Texas 2008 Total Building Permits: 10,388

Fort Worth, always operating in the shadow of higher profile Dallas, nevertheless can currently claim to have a slightly healthier housing market, based on its employment growth, relatively strong permit activity, and inexpensive housing. Now the 14th largest home building market in the country, Ft. Worth’s builders pulled 10,388 permits last year, roughly two-thirds of them single-family. That may be half as many as 2005, but many other major markets showed much sharper drop-offs. The relative strength of the Fort Worth market in recent years stems from its ties to the oil and gas industries, which has fueled above-average job growth. The metro area added 17,300 jobs last year.

2. Austin, Texas 2008 Total Building Permits: 14,250

Nine years ago, during the tech bust, some builders felt that Austin was too crowded and left. The bloom is back on Austin’s yellow rose now; it moved up the leader board to become the sixth largest home building market last year. Job creation explains the move. While other markets lost employment, Austin added 17,400 jobs last year, 2.31 percent growth rate. It helps that Austin is home to both a major university, The University of Texas, and the state capital. Existing homes cost a little bit more in Austin than other Texas markets, roughly $190,900, but that’s still below the national average. Also, Austin is one of the few metro areas in the country where median prices actually rose in 2008–1.4 percent through the first three quarters of the year. Amazingly, Austin now generates more home building activity than Chicago, which has six times more people.

1. Houston, Texas 2008 Total Building Permits: 42,697
They like to do things big in Houston. Now the metro area, home to nearly 5.8 million people, can lay claim to being the largest home building market in the country, with 42,697 building permits. The market is still benefiting from an influx of population and jobs and rebuilding in the wake of Hurricane Ike. Employment rose 2.2 percent last year, representing the addition of an incredible 57,000 jobs. Home building activity in Houston has only fallen 31 percent since 2005. Also, existing home prices actually rose in Houston last year, 2.8 percent, to $160,200, still a very affordable level. Roughly one third of the home building action is in Harris County, followed by Houston proper and Fort Bend County. One of Houston’s largest builders, Royce Homes, shut down last year, and Kimball Hill, one of the biggest builders in Texas, closed its doors this year after it failed to find a buyer.

Selling Your Home In Today’s Market

admin — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:16:00 +0000

‘Realistic’ approach is needed in weak market
by Ellen James Martin-Universal Press Syndicate

Those who sell real estate recall those heady days just a few years ago, when competition over the best homes on the market – known as “showcase properties” – was robust. Multiple bids were common, and eager buyers submitted contract offers stripped of all conditions, such as the right to a home inspection.

Indeed, some buyers were so anxious to beat rival bidders in the race to own an attractive home that they would snap it up without even visiting first, recalls Tom Early, a real-estate broker and former president of the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (www.naeba.org).

Nowadays, the tables are turned. In many neighborhoods, buyers have lots of leverage, and motivated sellers, including the corporate owners of homes taken back through foreclosure, are compelled to bargain with prospects. The sellers of showcase homes, known as “cream puffs,” are no exception. “At a time when buyers are incredibly demanding, you must be absolutely realistic about the market,” Early says.

Here are pointers for the sellers of homes with exceptional allure:

• Select a listing agent with a good eye.

“If your house is spectacular, you want visuals to show just how good it looks,” says Dorcas Helfant, a former president of the National Association of Realtors (www.realtor.org).

Visuals include photos for print advertising and video for online listings, including the “virtual tours” that have become a popular home-marketing tool in cyberspace.

As Helfant notes, more agents are taking classes in digital photography, and more are producing the sort of professional-quality visuals that home sellers need to compete, especially in neighborhoods with many homes for sale.

• Don’t expect too much of a pricing premium.

Is the property you’re selling decked out with several features that excite buyer interest, such as fine wood cabinets, granite countertops, floor-to-ceiling windows and a fireplace in the master suite? Does it also have 10-foot ceilings throughout? If so, you may be tempted to ask a lot more than your neighbors are asking for similar-size properties that lack such fancy features.

But Helfant cautions against attaching too high a premium when pricing your showcase home, no matter how fancy or well-kept it is.

“Given today’s competitive markets, where available properties abound, I wouldn’t go more than 3 to 5 percent over other like homes in your community, even the ones that don’t show nearly as well,” she says.

• Consider a neighborhood open house for the public.

Real-estate experts often downplay the value of public open houses as a means of attracting the interest of serious purchasers. They say most open-house visitors are curious neighbors or “wishful buyers” who lack the means to go through with a purchase. On the other hand, well-qualified buyers are typically guided through homes by their agents.

But Helfant says there’s a way to increase the impact of the public open house conducted for your showcase property: Encourage other sellers in the neighborhood to hold open houses on the same day, thereby increasing your potential draw.

“Ask your listing agent to contact the agents representing all the other sellers. The more the merrier when it comes to open houses. With more homes open, the greater the chance that serious prospects will come by, with or without their agents,” Helfant says.

A neighborhood open house can be especially beneficial for the sellers of showcase homes because buyers can quickly compare all the places they see.

• Don’t second-guess yourself on your plans to sell.

Many owners of showcase homes are ambivalent about letting go of their properties in a market where bargain shoppers have so much clout. Even after they’ve put their place up for sale, they wonder if they should pull the place off the market until they can get a better price.

Before retreating, Early urges you to take into account the personal and financial implications of postponing your sale.

“Maybe your neighborhood market could stage a huge rebound within one to two years. But you should also consider all the ways you might lose out by waiting,” Early says.

“Postponing your hopes and dreams for a better housing situation means you could be missing that once-in-a-lifetime chance to buy your fantasy property at a major discount,” he says.

‘Realistic’ approach is needed in Real Estate weak market

admin — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:12:00 +0000

‘Realistic’ approach is needed in weak market
by Ellen James Martin-Universal Press Syndicate

Here are pointers for the sellers of homes with exceptional allure:

• Select a listing agent with a good eye.

“If your house is spectacular, you want visuals to show just how good it looks,” says Dorcas Helfant, a former president of the National Association of Realtors (www.realtor.org).

Visuals include photos for print advertising and video for online listings, including the “virtual tours” that have become a popular home-marketing tool in cyberspace.

• Don’t expect too much of a pricing premium.

But Helfant cautions against attaching too high a premium when pricing your showcase home, no matter how fancy or well-kept it is.

• Consider a neighborhood open house for the public.

A neighborhood open house can be especially beneficial for the sellers of showcase homes because buyers can quickly compare all the places they see.

• Don’t second-guess yourself on your plans to sell.

Before retreating, Early urges you to take into account the personal and financial implications of postponing your sale.

“Maybe your neighborhood market could stage a huge rebound within one to two years. But you should also consider all the ways you might lose out by waiting,” Early says.

“Postponing your hopes and dreams for a better housing situation means you could be missing that once-in-a-lifetime chance to buy your fantasy property at a major discount,” he says.

Click here to Search the complete Phoenix Metro area MLS for FREE. Bette Zerba – GRI, and Trisha Brooks, GRI Re/Max, are ready to help you find that Phoenix metro area new home, sell your home, or look for commercial property. With today’s real estate market, bank owned, REO, Foreclosures, you need a Realtor who is knowledgeable, can negotiate and is ethical. You also need a sense of humor, and Bette Zerba, and Trisha Brooks not only will meet your real estate needs, but also will make you smile. It’s A Great Day In Phoenix Real Estate! Put a smile on your face, Call Bette 602-791-1766 and Trish 602-618-3053 today .

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will have lower limits on the size of loans they can buy.

admin — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:09:00 +0000

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will have lower limits on the size of loans they can buy.

WASHINGTON – People looking to buy more expensive homes next year will have fewer options to find financing because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will have lower limits on the size of loans they can buy.

The changes, effective Jan. 1, will lower the limit in high-priced real estate markets to $625,500 down from $729,950. Consumers who need to take out home loans above that amount typically pay higher interest rates, and that can price some would-be buyers out of the market.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates Fannie and Freddie, kept the limit for lower-cost metro areas at $417,000. Some counties, including parts of Virginia, Utah and Maryland, have limits that range between $625,000 and $417,000.

Lawmakers temporarily raised the loan limits for Fannie and Freddie in a housing bill passed over the summer.

There are fears, however, that the reduced limits will hurt the housing market next year. Fannie and Freddie have become the dominant source of mortgage funding since last year’s collapse of the subprime lending market.

The National Association of Realtors is pressing lawmakers to keep the limit at $729,950 to help the U.S. housing market recover from its worst slump in decades.

Ready to find a home at a great price in the Phoenix Metro Area. Speak To A Professional RE/MAX Phoenix Realtor NOW….Call : 623-979-8888. We can show you foreclosures, Short Sales, REO, as well as any and all homes for sale in the Maricopa area. Search the complete Phoenix AZ MLS for free at http://www.buyphoenixazhomes.com/

Senate Passes Foreclosure Rescue

admin — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:11:00 +0000

Senate Passes Foreclosure Rescue

WASHINGTON – A mortgage rescue to help hundreds of thousands of struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure and get more affordable, safer loans passed the Senate overwhelmingly Friday, but it faces a bumpy road amid continuing turmoil in the housing market.

The 63-5 vote reflected a keen interest by Democrats and Republicans to send election-year help to distressed homeowners with economic issues topping voters’ concerns.

The plan lets homeowners buckling under mortgage payments they can’t afford keep their homes and get more affordable mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration. Banks that agreed to take substantial losses on those distressed loans could avoid costly foreclosures and be assured of recovering at least some money.
The new program would let the FHA insure as much as $300 billion in new mortgages, helping an estimated 400,000 homeowners.

It still faces challenges, however, with the House planning to rewrite key details and the White House threatening a veto without major changes.

“It’s not the final stop, but it is a major stop in getting this bill done,” said Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Banking Committee. “For those who said this Congress cannot come together in a bipartisan fashion to do something responsible about housing, this bill does that.”

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman and an architect of the bill, says the few but significant revisions House leaders are seeking could be made in as little as one week.

Dodd said he was expecting minor “tweaks” that could be dealt with quickly.

But key players are bracing for intense negotiations to resolve the differences. They hope to smooth over disputes with the White House at the same time, with an eye toward producing a bill President Bush could sign later this month.

The White House Friday renewed its warning that Bush would veto the Senate-passed bill without revisions, citing $3.9 billion in the measure for buying and rehabilitating foreclosed properties it said would help lenders, not homeowners.

The measure includes a long-sought modernization of the FHA and would create a new regulator and tighter controls on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage giants. It also would provide $14.5 billion in housing tax breaks, including a credit of up to $8,000 for first-time home buyers.

Democrats are divided over important elements of the plan, including limits on loans the FHA may insure and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may buy. The Senate measure sets them at $625,000, while House leaders – including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. – want the cap as high as $730,000.

House leaders also oppose the immediate effective date of the Senate plan, preferring to phase in the new regulations for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over six months.

“We’d have a hard time agreeing to that,” Dodd told reporters Friday. He called a Capitol Hill news conference to dispel fears about the financial health of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as their stocks plummeted on reports that the government was considering taking over one or both of them.

Another key point of dispute is the funding in the Senate measure for buying and fixing foreclosed properties. The House’s band of conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats oppose the money, arguing that it would swell the deficit unless paired with cuts or tax increases to cover the cost.

But many Democrats, particularly members of the Congressional Black Caucus, are fighting to keep the funding, which they say will help prevent the communities hardest hit by the housing crisis from sliding into blight.

“There are people who tell me to ignore” that threat, Frank said in a statement Friday. “But there is too much that is important in this bill, and it has already been too long delayed by procedural problems in the Senate, for us to risk the further delay involved in a veto.”

He said he was working to find a way to shift the funds to a must-pass spending bill that would be approved before lawmakers scatter for the year in September.

Dana Perino, Bush’s spokeswoman, said the money should be stripped out of the measure “so that they can get a housing bill to the president that he could sign right away.”

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., the presumptive presidential nominee, said Bush should drop his opposition to the housing plan and other Democratic efforts to ease economic pain.

“I call on the administration to support this bill along with a second emergency stimulus package to jumpstart the economy and build on this important start to advance more rigorous measures to protect homeowners from foreclosure,” he said. Obama was on the campaign trail Friday and did not vote on the measure, which had been expected to pass by a wide margin. He was one of 32 senators not voting.

With the administration scrambling to tamp down on investor fears about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Perino called the new regulations in the measure for the two mortgage giants its “most important feature.”

Lawmakers and the Bush administration agree on the central concept behind the housing package: allowing the government to backstop new mortgages for struggling homeowners.

To make it more palatable to Republicans, the Senate measure would take responsibility for any losses away from taxpayers and instead cover them by diverting a newly created affordable housing fund drawn from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits.